• Home
  • RRC
  • About this Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Register
  • Logout
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Health, Safety & Environmental Training that Works

  • Health & Safety
  • Environmental Management
  • Events
  • Show Search
Hide Search
Environmental Risk Control Hierarchies

Environmental Risk Control Hierarchies

John Binns · 28/07/2025 · Leave a Comment

Introduction

Much of the work of an environmental practitioner involves identifying and managing risk to the environment in one way or another. As I tell the students I train, when it comes to answering exam questions on control, it’s always helpful to use a framework. Frameworks help ‘spin out’ an answer, making it more detailed than it might be if the issues were considered individually.

 A good framework for controlling many different types of environmental problems are hierarchies of control and there are numerous in environmental management and other disciplines such as health and safety and accounting. They work on a sliding scale such that those options at the top are the most environmentally desirable right down to the one at the bottom that are the least environmentally desirable.

The bigger picture

Hierarchies tend to work on the same overarching principles. The first for most is elimination (or prevention) – don’t carry out an activity and get rid of the risk straight away! This is not always feasible, however. The next best option, therefore, is reducing the risk in some way, such as by storing less hazardous substances or substituting the hazardous substance for something that is marginally safer. It does not eliminate the risk to the environment, but minimises it to some extent. After this, it comes down to controlling what is present in some way – perhaps through technology, information or training. Human-orientated controls, such as following instructions, are less desirable compared to technology-based ones.

Source – Pathway – Target

Our first example, largely used to control pollution, is source–pathway–target (SPT). This works on the general principle that the best option is to consider the source of a problem first. Essentially, this covers elimination (getting rid of a noisy machine, for example) or reduction (replacing the noisy machine with a quieter one, or fitting something to reduce the noise). In essence, the pollutant is either not created or is kept close to the source and dealt with there.

Next, we put something in the pathway to block the pollutant or filter it out in some way. The pollutant has been created, but something will stop it from reaching where it causes harm, for example a noise barrier.

Finally, at the bottom of this hierarchy, we have control very close to, or at, the point where it would cause harm, commonly known as the target. This is more about reducing the damage than controlling the pollutant, as it is already in a position where it could cause harm.

Greenhouse Gases 

The Institute of Sustainability and Environmental Professionals (ISEP) (formerly known as IEMA) developed a hierarchy for dealing with greenhouse gases (GHGs) a few years ago in their Pathways to Net Zero briefing paper. You can see that it starts with eliminating greenhouse gas production through actions such as transitioning to a different business model, followed by substituting or reducing GHGs (for example, by choosing more efficient equipment), and ends with compensate.

Compensate is particularly interesting, as it largely refers to offsetting, where organisations fund external GHG reduction projects and claim those reductions against their own commitments.

Waste management 

This example is quite a specific hierarchy that is used to control waste. There are many versions, all very similar, but the one stated in UK and EU laws starts with preventing and reducing waste, followed by preparing for reuse (actions so that the waste can be reused again such as checking or cleaning), recycling, other recovery (anaerobic digestion and burning the waste and harvesting the heat created being two examples) and disposal.

Final Note

Risk control hierarchies are useful things for a component environmental practitioner as they add a framework of control that allows for elimination, reduction and control of an environmental risk. We have covered three examples here, but there are many more!

John Binns BSc (Hons), MSc, MIEMA

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is J-Binns.png

John Binns BSc (Hons) MSc MIEMA is an experienced environmental tutor and consultant

Tweet
Share
Pin
Share

Filed Under: Environmental Management Tagged With: environment, Environmental Management, greenhouse gases, Risk Control Hierarchies, Source – Pathway – Target, waste management

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Popular Posts

Environmental Risk Control HierarchiesEnvironmental Risk Control Hierarchies0 Total Shares
Fire Safety in the WorkplaceFire Safety in the Workplace0 Total Shares
Important Update: IEMA Rebranded to the Institute of Sustainability and Environmental Professionals (ISEP)Important Update: IEMA Rebranded to the Institute of Sustainability and Environmental Professionals (ISEP)0 Total Shares

Categories

Latest Articles

  • Environmental Risk Control Hierarchies
  • Fire Safety in the Workplace
  • Important Update: IEMA Rebranded to the Institute of Sustainability and Environmental Professionals (ISEP)
  • Who is Responsible for Health & Safety in the Workplace?
  • Five Skills That Make an Effective Environmental Management Practitioner
  • Managing Organisational Environmental Compliance Obligations
  • The Importance of Nutrient Cycling
  • What does ESG actually mean?
  • Is Recycling Really Good for the Environment? Pros and Cons Explained
  • What Is a Risk Assessment?

Article Archive

Admin

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Copyright © 2025 • Daily Dish Pro on Genesis Framework • WordPress • Log in